Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 151(2): 185-196, feb. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1522082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severity assessment in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) allows to guide the site of care (ambulatory or hospitalization), diagnostic workup and treatment. AIM: To examine the performance of twelve severity predictive indexes (CRB65, CURB65, PSI, SCAP, SMART-COP, REA-ICU, ATS minor criteria, qSOFA, CALL, COVID GRAM, 4C, STSS) in adult patients hospitalized for CAP associated with SARS-CoV-2. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective clinical study conducted between April 1 and September 30, 2020 in adult patients hospitalized for CAP associated with COVID-19 in a clinical hospital. The recorded adverse events were admission to the critical care unit, use of mechanical ventilation (MV), prolonged length of stay, and hospital mortality. The predictive rules were compared based on their sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Adverse events were more common and hospital stay longer in the high-risk categories of the different prognostic indices. CURB-65, PSI, SCAP, COVID GRAM, 4 C and STSS predicted the risk of death accurately. PSI, SCAP, ATS minor criteria, CALL and 4 C criteria were sensitive in predicting the risk of hospital mortality with high negative predictive value. The performance of different prognostic indices decreased significantly for the prediction of ICU admission, use of mechanical ventilation, and prolonged hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the prognostic indices differs significantly for the prediction of adverse events in immunocompetent adult patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia associated with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Pneumonia , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , COVID-19 , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 149(8): 1107-1118, ago. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389568

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 is a serious public health problem worldwide. Aim: To describe the clinical features of COVID-19 infection in adult patients consulting at an Emergency Service. Material and Methods: Descriptive prospective study of adult patients with suspected COVID-19 consulting between April 1 and July 31, 2020, at the Emergency Service of a clinical hospital. Clinical features, chronic comorbidities and demographic data were recorded. Results: We assessed 2,958 adult patients aged 42 ± 15 years (46% males). In 54% of them, COVID-19 infection was confirmed, 40% had preexisting diseases, especially hypertension (15%), hypothyroidism (6%), diabetes (6%), asthma (5%) and obesity (6%). The main clinical manifestations associated with COVID-19 were general malaise (79%), anorexia (38%), myalgia (64%), fever (52%), headache (70%), anosmia/dysgeusia (60%), cough (56%), dyspnea (54%) and diarrhea (36%). In the multivariate analysis, the main clinical predictors of COVID-19 infection were malaise, anorexia, fever, myalgia, headache, nasal congestion, cough, expectoration, anosmia/dysgeusia, and history of close contact with a SARS-CoV-2 patient. Odynophagia and chest discomfort were negative predictors of the disease. The history of fever associated with anorexia, cough, and dyspnea or anosmia/dysgeusia and close contact with a SARS-CoV-2 patient had high specificity and positive predictive value for COVID-19 infection. Conclusions: Clinical features of COVID-19 infection were highly unspecific in these patients. Clinical diagnostic prediction models could be useful to support healthcare decision making at primary care setting.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Emergency Medical Services , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Cough/etiology , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 148(10)oct. 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389230

ABSTRACT

Background: In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan city and spread rapidly throughout China and the world. Aim: To describe the clinical features, risk factors, and predictors of hospitalization in adult patients treated for acute respiratory infections associated with coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Material and Methods: Descriptive prospective study of ambulatory and hospitalized adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 attended between April 1 and May 31, 2020. Clinical features, chronic comorbidities and demographic data were recorded, and patients were followed for two months as outpatients. Results: We assessed 1,022 adults aged 41 ± 14 years (50% men) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. One-third had comorbidities, specially hypertension (12.5%), hypothyroidism (6.6%), asthma (5.4%) and diabetes (4.5%). Hospital admission was required in 11%, 5.2% were admitted to critical care unit and 0.9% were connected to mechanical ventilation. Common symptoms included fatigue (55.4%), fever (52.5%), headache (68.6%), anosmia/dysgeusia (53.2%), dry cough (53.4%), dyspnea (27.4%) and diarrhea (35.5%). One third of patients reported persistence of symptoms at one-month follow-up, specially fatigue, cough and dyspnea. In the multivariate analysis, age, fever, cough, dyspnea and immunosuppression were associated with hospitalization and ICU admission. Age, male sex and moderate-severe dyspnea were associated with requirement of mechanical ventilation. The main predictors of prolonged clinical course were female sex, presence of comorbidities, history of dyspnea, cough, myalgia and abdominal pain. Conclusions: Clinical features of COVID-19 were highly unspecific. Prediction models for severity, will help medical decision making at the primary care setting.

4.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 148(7): 895-905, jul. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1139390

ABSTRACT

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) affects approximately 10%-20% of adults and is associated with obesity, hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Aim: To assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with OSAS in Chilean adults. Material and Methods: A standardized sleep questionnaire and respiratory polygraphy at home were conducted on adults aged 18 years or more, residing in the Metropolitan Region and enrolled in the 2016/17 National Health Survey. Results: Two-hundred and five people between 18 and 84 years old (46% men, mean age 50 years) underwent overnight respiratory polygraphy at home. The estimated obstructive sleep apnea prevalence was 49% (62% men, 31% women) considering an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 respiratory events/hour, and 16% (21% men, 13% women) considering an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 respiratory events/hour. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea continuously increased along with age for men and women, with a later onset for women. Age, gender, body mass index, cervical and waist circumference, snoring, reporting of apnea by proxies, self-reported cardiovascular and metabolic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia, were significantly associated with OSAS. No association was found with insomnia and daytime sleepiness. Conclusions: The prevalence and risk factors associated to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were high among these adults.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Chile/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Health Surveys
5.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 148(6): 724-733, jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1139364

ABSTRACT

Background: Healthcare personnel are a high-risk group for acquiring COVID-19 disease. They represent 4 to 20% of the total number of cases reported in different geographical areas. Aim: To describe an epidemiological surveillance strategy to detect symptoms compatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection and early case detection among healthcare personnel at a university hospital. Patients and Methods: We assessed 209 healthcare workers reporting symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 in a telephone counseling system. After a structured evaluation, the suggestions ranged from having a SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab PCR test, consulting in the emergency room or at outpatient clinic or returning to work. Results: In 61% of assessed workers a coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab PCR was requested and 28 (22%) were positive. In a multivariate analysis, the clinical variables associated with a positive PCR test were the presence of fever, sudden loss of smell or taste, and a history of contact with a COVID-19 positive case. Conclusions: The telephone symptom monitoring program allowed the early detection of a significant number of healthcare officials with acute respiratory infection due to coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, it is easy to implement and has a low cost.


Subject(s)
Humans , Coronavirus Infections , Health Personnel , Fever , Betacoronavirus
6.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(12): 1543-1552, dic. 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1094188

ABSTRACT

Background The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is based on nocturnal records: polysomnography or respiratory polygraphy. However, their high costs limit their use. Aim To examine the predictive value of three sleep questionnaires (STOP, STOP-Bang, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in the screening of OSAS in Chilean adults. Material and Methods During the National Health Survey 2016/17, 205 adults aged 50.7 ± 15.0 years (46% males) living in the Metropolitan Region answered sleep questionnaires and underwent an ambulatory respiratory polygraphy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and receiver operating characteristic curves of sleep questionnaires were calculated. Results Fifty nine percent of participants had OSAS which was moderate to severe in 26%. The clinical variables associated with OSAS were age, male gender, hypertension, dyslipidemia, overweight, cervical and waist circumferences, history of regular snoring and witnessed apneas. Daytime somnolence, insomnia and unrefreshing sleep were not associated to OSAS risk. STOP, STOP-Bang and ESS questionnaires classified 64%, 71% and 12% of cases as high risk for OSAS, respectively. The STOP and STOP-Bang questionnaires had the highest sensitivity to predict OSAS (76% and 89%, respectively) while the ESS had the highest specificity (91%). Conclusions The sleep questionnaires allowed to identify the subjects at high risk for OSAS in this sample of adults from the Metropolitan Region.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Urban Population , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Polysomnography
7.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(10): 1291-1302, oct. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058596

ABSTRACT

Background: Women with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAS) are less likely to be assessed or to receive an appropriate diagnosis, and they may have poorer quality of life and survival rates. Aim: To assess gender-specific clinical differences in adult patients with OSAS. Material and Methods: A standardized clinical questionnaire and four sleep questionnaires (Berlin, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, STOP and STOP-Bang) were administered and anthropometric data were measured. Patients underwent an overnight in-laboratory polysomnography to confirm the diagnosis of OSAS. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity and specificity of clinical manifestations and sleep questionnaires were calculated. Results: Of 1,464 screened patients, 509 were female, 58.6% had moderate to severe OSAS. Clinical variables associated with OSAS risk in women were age, insomnia, nocturia, hypertension and cervical circumference. Paired by age and respiratory events, the snoring frequency was similar in both genders, although witnessed apneas and high cervical circumference and waist/hip ratio were more common in males. Morning headaches, insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, depression, anxiety and poor quality of sleep were more common in women. Women were older than men, more obese (although with an obesity pattern less centrally distributed) and referred hypertension, diabetes, depression and hypothyroidism with higher frequency. Sleep questionnaires performance were similar in both sexes. Conclusions: It is likely that women with OSAS may partially be underdiagnosed due to circumstances related to a different OSAS clinical expression.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Comorbidity , Chile/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Anthropometry , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Distribution , Age Distribution , Statistics, Nonparametric
8.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 147(8): 983-992, ago. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058633

ABSTRACT

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is used to monitor patients' response during treatment of infectious diseases. Morbidity and mortality associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is high, particularly in hospitalized patients. Better risk prediction during hospitalization could improve management and ultimately reduce mortality rates. Aim: To evaluate CRP measured at admission and the third day of hospitalization as a predictor for adverse events in CAP. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with CAP at an academic hospital. Major adverse outcomes were admission to ICU, mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospital length of stay, hospital complications and 30-day mortality. Predictive associations between CRP (as absolute levels and relative decline at third day) and adverse events were analyzed. Results: Eight hundred and twenty-three patients were assessed, 19% were admitted to ICU and 10.6% required mechanical ventilation. The average hospital stay was 8.8 ± 8.2 days, 42% had nosocomial complications and 8.1% died within 30 days. Ninety eight percent of patients had elevated serum CRP on admission to the hospital (18.1 ± 14.1 mg/dL). C-reactive protein measured at admission was associated with the risk of bacterial pneumonia, bacteremic pneumonia, septic shock and use of mechanical ventilation. Lack of CRP decline within three days of hospitalization was associated with high risk of complications, septic shock, mechanical ventilation and prolonged hospital stay. Conclusions: CRP responses at third day of hospital admission was a valuable predictor of adverse events in hospitalized CAP adult patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Pneumonia/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Community-Acquired Infections/blood , Immunocompetence , Pneumonia/immunology , Pneumonia/mortality , Prognosis , Shock, Septic/mortality , Shock, Septic/blood , Time Factors , Biomarkers/blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Community-Acquired Infections/immunology , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Area Under Curve
9.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 146(12): 1371-1383, dic. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-991346

ABSTRACT

Background: Molecular biological techniques allow the identification of more pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Aim: To compare clinical and laboratory parameters of patients with CAP caused by different groups of pathogens. Material and Methods: In a prospective study, immunocompetent adult patients hospitalized with CAP were tested for the presence of a broad range of possible respiratory pathogens using bacterial cultures, polymerase chain reaction, urinary antigen testing and serology. Results: Pathogens were detected in 367 of 935 patients with CAP (39.2%). Streptococcus pneumoniae (10.7%) and influenza virus (6%) were the most frequently identified bacterial and viral pathogens, respectively. Pneumococcal pneumonia predominated in older adults, with multiple comorbidities, with elevation of inflammatory parameters and hypoxemia, like other bacterial pneumonias. Viral pneumonia predominated in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities, with a shorter hospital length of stay and lower mortality. Pneumonia associated with atypical microorganisms predominated in young adults, smokers, with subacute clinical evolution. Their hospital stays and lethality was similar to other bacterial pneumonias. Viral and classical bacterial pneumonias predominated in high risk pneumonia severity index categories. Although several variables were associated with the detection of a pathogen group, substantial overlap avoided the identification of reliable clinical predictors to distinguish etiologies. Conclusions: The clinical and radiographic characteristics were similar in pulmonary infections caused by classical bacteria, respiratory viruses and atypical microorganisms. Therefore, microbial testing for common respiratory pathogens is still necessary to optimize treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Immunocompetence , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Socioeconomic Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/virology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Length of Stay
10.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 146(10): 1123-1134, dic. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-978747

ABSTRACT

Background: Simple but accurate tools should be used to identify patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), aiming at an early detection and prevention of serious consequences. Aim: To assess the predictive value of four sleep questionnaires (Berlin, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], STOP, and STOP-Bang) in the screening of patients with OSAS. Material and Methods: The four sleep questionnaires were administered to 1,050 snorers aged 56 ± 15 years (68% males) assessed at a sleep clinic. An overnight unattended respiratory polygraphy was performed to all patients to confirm the diagnosis of OSAS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the four questionnaires were calculated. Results: Eighty four percent of participants had OSAS. The clinical variables associated with OSAS risk were age, male gender, hypertension, overweight, cervical circumference, waist/hip ratio, history of snoring, witnessed apneas and nycturia. Eighty-three, 86, 92 and 46 % of cases were classified as having a high risk for OSAS, according to the Berlin, STOP and STOP-Bang questionnaires and ESS, respectively. STOP and STOP-Bang questionnaires had the highest sensitivity to predict OSAS (88 and 95%, respectively) while the Flemons Index had the highest specificity (82%). Conclusions: Sleep questionnaires were able to identify patients with a high risk for OSAS but without accurately excluding those at low risk.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Reference Values , Snoring/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Polysomnography/methods , Statistics, Nonparametric , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology
11.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 145(6): 694-702, June 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-902533

ABSTRACT

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) causes significant morbidity and mortality in adults. Aim: To compare the accuracy of four validated rules for predicting adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized with CAP. Patients and Methods: We compared the pneumonia severity index (PSI), British Thoracic Society score (CURB-65), SMART-COP and severe CAP score (SCAP) in 659 immunocompetent adult patients aged 18 to 101 years, 52% male, hospitalized with CAP. Major adverse outcomes were: admission to ICU, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), in-hospital complications and 30-day mortality. Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was also evaluated. The predictive indexes were compared based on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the studied patients, 77% had comorbidities, 23% were admitted to the intensive care unit and 12% needed mechanical ventilation. The rate of all adverse outcomes and hospital LOS increased directly with increasing PSI, CURB-65, SMART-COP and SCAP scores. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the prognostic indexes to predict adverse events were: Admission to ICU (PSI: 0.48, 0.84 and 0.73; SMART-COP: 0.97, 0.23 and 0.75; SCAP: 0.57, 0.81 and 0.76); use of MV (PSI: 0.44, 0.84 and 0.75; SMART-COP: 0.96, 0.35 and 0.84; SCAP: 0.53, 0.87 and 0.78); 30-days mortality (PSI: 0.45, 0.97 and 0.83; SMART-COP: 0.94, 0.29 and 0.77; SCAP: 0.53, 0.95 and 0.81). CURB-65 had a lower discriminatory power compared to the other indices. Conclusions: PSI score and SCAP were more accurate and specific and SMART-COP was more sensitive to predict the risk of death. SMART-COP was more sensitive and SCAP was more specific in predicting the use of mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Pneumonia/immunology , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia/mortality , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/immunology , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data
12.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 144(12): 1513-1522, dic. 2016. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-845481

ABSTRACT

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a relevant worldwide cause of morbidity and mortality in adult population, however its etiology is often not identified and therapy is empirical. Aim: To assess the etiology of CAP in immunocompetent adult hospitalized patients using conventional and molecular diagnostic methods. Material and Methods: We prospectively studied 240 adult patients who were hospitalized for CAP to identify the microbial etiology. Sputum and blood cultures were obtained as well as serology testing for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae, urinary antigen testing for Legionella pneumophila and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and a nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of sixteen respiratory viruses by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: In 100 patients (41.7%) a single respiratory pathogen was identified. In 17 (7.1%) cases, a mixed bacterial and viral infection was detected and no pathogen was identified in 123 cases (51%). The most commonly identified pathogens identified were: influenza virus (15.4%), parainfluenza virus (10.8%), rhinovirus (5%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (5%), respiratory syncytial virus (2.9%) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (2.5%). Infectious agent detection by RT-PCR provided greater sensitivity than conventional techniques. Viral respiratory infections were more prevalent in older patients with comorbidities and high risk patients, according to the Fine index at hospital admission. The clinical severity and outcome were independent of the etiological agents detected. Conclusions: The use of molecular diagnostic techniques expanded the detection of respiratory viruses in immunocompetent adults hospitalized with CAP.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/genetics , Immunocompetence , Pneumonia, Viral/microbiology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/classification , Seasons , Severity of Illness Index , Prospective Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Coinfection
13.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 144(11): 1382-1390, nov. 2016. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-845459

ABSTRACT

Background: Identifying risk factors for lung cancer in the population could improve the cost-effectiveness of early detection programs using thoracic computed tomography (CT). Aim: To examine the risk factors of lung cancer in a cohort of adult smokers. Patients and Methods: An annual clinical and respiratory functional assessment, chest computed tomography for three years and clinical follow up for five years was carried out in 270 patients aged 65 ± 9 years, 55% males, active or former smokers of 10 or more pack-years. Results: Thirty seven percent of patients were active smokers, consuming 37 ± 26 packs/year, 85% had comorbidities, especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (66%), hypertension (48%), diabetes (22%) and dyslipidemia (42%). Thirteen percent of patients had family history of lung cancer. Twenty-one cases of lung cancer were detected in the five years follow up, especially squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. In the univariate analysis, the main risk factors for lung cancer identified were an age older than 60 years, history of COPD, family history of lung cancer, active smoking, tobacco consumption more than 30 pack/year and lung hyperinflation. In multivariate analysis, the three independent risk factors for lung cancer were a family history of lung cancer, active smoking and the number of packs per year of tobacco consumption. Conclusions: The identification of risk groups probably will improve the performance of programs for early detection of lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Comorbidity , Chile/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Risk Assessment , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/etiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/etiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Hypertension/etiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology
14.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 141(5): 664-668, mayo 2013. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-684375

ABSTRACT

We report a 64 years-old woman who underwent sparing mastectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. One month after the end of radiotherapy, she presented with malaise, fever, fatigue, cough and migratory bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on serial radiological images. The microbiological studies of broncha alveolar lavage were negative. The patient under went a trans bronchial biopsy and the pathological diagnosis was compatible with an organizing pneumonia presumably associated with radiotherapy. Systemic steroid treatment was successful with rapid and complete resolution ofclinical and radiographic manifestations.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/etiology , Radiation Pneumonitis/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects
15.
Rev. chil. med. intensiv ; 28(1): 27-37, 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-831371

ABSTRACT

El dolor lumbar inespecífico constituye un grave problema desalud pública en todo el mundo. La prevalencia estimada a lolargo de la vida del dolor lumbar puede ser tan alta como 84%,y la prevalencia del dolor lumbar crónico es cercana a 23%, con11%-12% de invalidez debido a esta condición. Los pacientes conesta dolencia suelen consultar en el servicio de urgencia para suevaluación y tratamiento. Debido a que es un síndrome común conetiología y evolución generalmente benignas, el médico de urgenciaspuede pasar por alto los hallazgos clínicos que orientan a unaenfermedad grave. Este artículo revisa los elementos clínicos en laanamnesis y examen físico importantes a considerar, con énfasisen las señales de alerta de enfermedad grave. Las señales de alertapueden orientar al clínico en la evaluación diagnóstica, tratamientoespecífico y la derivación a un especialista de columna. Entre lasbanderas rojas a considerar, se incluyen el antecedente de traumasignificativo en relación a la edad, el déficit motor o sensorialprogresivo, la incontinencia urinaria o fecal de reciente aparición, la pérdida de tono del esfínter anal, anestesia en silla de montar,antecedentes de cáncer con metástasis ósea y la sospecha de infecciónespinal. En los pacientes sin elementos clínicos de riesgo o gravedad,el estudio diagnóstico por imágenes y los exámenes de laboratorio amenudo no son necesarios. Aunque existen numerosos tratamientospara el dolor lumbar agudo inespecífico, la mayoría tienen escasaevidencia que avale su costo-beneficio. La educación del paciente ylos medicamentos antiinflamatorios no esteroidales, paracetamol yrelajantes musculares son beneficiosos.


Non-specific low back pain has become a major public health problem worldwide. The lifetime prevalence of low back pain is reported to be as high as 84 percent, and the prevalence of chronic low back pain is about 23 percent, with 11 percent-12 percent of the population being disabled by low back pain. Patients with low back pain commonly present in the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. Because it is a common syndrome with a generally benign origin, the examiner may overlook markers of serious disease. This article reviews the important historical and physical factors to consider, with an emphasis on the red flags of serious disease. Certain red flags should prompt aggressive treatment or referral to a spine specialist, whereas others are less concerning. Serious red flags include significant trauma related to age, major or progressive motor or sensory deficit, new-onset bowel or bladder incontinence or urinary retention, loss of anal sphincter tone, saddle anesthesia, history of cancer metastatic to bone, and suspected spinal infection. Without clinical signs of serious pathology, diagnostic imaging and laboratory testing often are not required. Although there are numerous treatments for nonspecific acute low back pain, most have little evidence of benefit. Patient education and medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and muscle relaxants are beneficial.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/therapy , Emergency Medical Services , Diagnosis, Differential , Prognosis
16.
Rev. chil. med. intensiv ; 27(4): 237-244, 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-831364

ABSTRACT

Los Servicios de Urgencia corresponden a centros de atención de alta complejidad médica que no presentan restricciones de entrada a los usuarios. Se atiende a pacientes con motivos de consulta indiferenciados, cursando desde etapas iniciales de la enfermedad hasta presentaciones avanzadas con riesgo vital. El enfrentamiento inicial del paciente con patología indiferenciada aguda en la unidad de emergencia se denomina evaluación primaria. La evolución y el pronóstico de los enfermos se verán influenciados por la detección y manejo oportuno de aquellas condiciones que amenazan su vida o funcionalidad. La evaluación primaria es una aproximación estructurada e indiferenciada al paciente con patología aguda potencialmente grave que permite la pesquisa oportuna y el tratamiento de aquellas condiciones que ponen en riesgo la vida o funcionalidad de los enfermos. En ella se propone un orden sistemático y reproducible para realizar la primera aproximación diagnóstica al paciente con patología aguda indiferenciada, reduciendo la posibilidad de omitir elementos que lleven a error o retraso diagnóstico en situaciones de riesgo vital. Se considera la exploración física detallada de la vía aérea (A), la respiración (B), la circulación (C), alteraciones neurológicas (D) y el examen físico sistemático (Exposición). En este artículo se exponen los objetivos, las características y la implementación de esta estrategia de enfrentamiento de los enfermos en la unidad de emergencia.


The emergency departments are highly complex medical systems offered without restrictions to users. It serves patients with undifferentiated reasons for consultation, ranging from early stages of the disease to life-threatening advanced presentations. The acute undifferentiated patient’s initial evaluation in the emergency unit is called primary assessment. The evolution and prognosis of emergency patients will be influenced by the detection and timely management of these life-threatening conditions. The primary assessment is a structured approach to the patient with undifferentiated acute potentially serious pathology that allows timely screening and treatment of conditions that endanger life or functionality of the sick. It proposes a systematic and reproducible initial diagnostic approach to patients with undifferentiated acute disease, reducing the possibility of missing elements that lead to diagnostic error or delay in life-threatening situations. It involves the detailed physical examination/assessment of airway (A), breathing (B), circulation (C), neurologic abnormalities (D) and head to toe examination (Exposure).This article outlines the objectives, features and implementation of this strategy of initial assessment of patients in the emergency unit.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Aged , Patient Acuity , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Triage/methods
17.
Rev. chil. med. intensiv ; 27(1): 41-51, 2012. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-669017

ABSTRACT

El síndrome diarreico agudo (SDA) es un motivo de consulta frecuente en la unidad de emergencia, correspondiendo entre 5-10 por ciento de todas las consultas. El cuadro clínico suele ser autolimitado y benigno en la mayoría de los casos, pero puede ser causa importante de morbimortalidad. El SDA es una causa frecuente de ausencia laboral y escolar. La historia clínica y el examen físico sistematizados permiten identificar la mayoría de las causas de SDA, valorar la gravedad del paciente, necesidad de hospitalización y decidir el tratamiento. En casos determinados se recomienda solicitar exámenes de laboratorio que orientan sobre la etiología como los leucocitos fecales, lactoferrina fecal, coprocultivo, toxina de Clostridium difficile y examen parasitológico seriado de deposiciones. El manejo básico en el servicio de urgencia consiste en rehidratación y analgesia. Las indicaciones de egreso incluyen hidratación oral, dieta, analgésicos, antidiarreicos, probióticos y antibióticos según el caso particular. Basados en un caso clínico discutiremos la evaluación y manejo del paciente adulto con diarrea aguda en la unidad de emergencia.


The acute diarrhea (AD) is a frequent complaint in emergency department, identifying about 5 to 10 percent of all queries. It is self limiting and benign in most cases but may be an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Determines a significant number of work and school absences. The history and physical examination achieve to identify most causes of AD, patient severity, need for hospitalization and treatment. In certain cases can be used etiological laboratory tests like fecal leukocytes, fecal lactoferrin, stool culture, Clostridium difficile toxin and parasitologic serial stool examination. Emergency management consists in rehydration and analgesia. The discharge instructions include oral hydration, diet, analgesics, antidiarrhoeal therapy, probiotics and antibiotics according to each case. Based on a clinical case we will discuss the evaluation and management of acute diarrhea in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/etiology , Diarrhea/therapy , Emergency Medicine , Acute Disease , Diarrhea/physiopathology , Gastroenteritis
18.
Rev. chil. med. intensiv ; 26(3): 181-188, 2011. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-669026

ABSTRACT

La fiebre es un motivo de consulta frecuente en los servicios de urgencia (SU), concentrando el 4,4 por ciento a 7,5 por ciento de las consultas. La evaluación del paciente adulto con fiebre en el servicio de urgencias siempre es un desafío. Aunque la condición subyacente que ocasiona los síntomas puede variar considerablemente, se requiere una aproximación diagnóstica sistematizada, identificando las categorías de riesgo y diferenciando las causas infecciosas que requieren tratamiento antimicrobiano. A pesar de ser un motivo de consulta frecuente no existe un manejo médico estandarizado. El amplio espectro de presentaciones puede ir desde pacientes graves y comprometidos, a pacientes de buen aspecto general febriles, siendo estos últimos donde la estratificación de riesgo es fundamental, reconociendo las poblaciones de riesgo elevado (inmunocomprometidos, embarazadas y el adulto mayor) que pueden tener infecciones graves y complicaciones asociadas serias. En el adulto joven febril sin foco evidente y sin factores de riesgo, se mantiene la discusión si existe algún marcador que por sí solo permita estratificar el riesgo en este grupo. En este contexto, ni el hemograma ni los biomarcadores de inflamación sistémica como la proteína C reactiva y la procalcitonina sérica han demostrado claros beneficios a favor de su uso. La implementación de un protocolo estandarizado basado en la evidencia en la evaluación y tratamiento del paciente adulto febril sin foco clínico evidente nos permitiría optimizar el uso de los recursos de salud y racionalizar el uso de antimicrobianos.


Febrile illness is one of the most frequent causes of attendance at emergency departments (EDs) worldwide, accounting for 4.4 to 7.5 percent of all ED consultation. The evaluation of adult patients with fever in the emergency department is always a challenge. Although the underlying conditions causing the symptom of fever vary considerably, it requires a systematic approach regardless of the underlying condition, concentrating upon a primary division between bacterial infections and other conditions and subsequent risk stratification, often using the same parameters. Despite being a frequent complaint there is no a standard medical management. The broad spectrum of presentations can range from serious and committed patients to patients in good general appearance with fever, the latter being where risk stratification is essential, recognizing high-risk populations (immunocompromised, pregnant women and the elderly) who may have infections and more serious complications. In the young adult patient, fever without apparent focus, with no risk factors, there is still debate as to whether there is a marker that allows itself to stratify risk in this group. In this context, the blood cell count and biomarkers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have not shown clear results in favor of its use. The implementation of a standardized protocol based on the evidence in the assessment and treatment of febrile adult patients without clinically apparent focus allow us to optimize the use of health resources and rational antimicrobials use.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/etiology , Age Factors , Calcitonin/analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergencies , Immunocompromised Host , Biomarkers/analysis , Pregnancy Complications , Prognosis , Protein Precursors/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Risk Assessment
19.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 130(9): 993-1000, sept. 2002. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-323232

ABSTRACT

Background: The clinical role of blood cultures (BC) in the management of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is controversial. Aim: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of blood cultures in CAP. Material and methods: We prospectively studied 244 immunocompetent adults with two or more BC obtained at admission. The diagnostic yield of BC and its impact on antibiotic therapy were assessed. Results: Mean age (xñsd) of patients was 67ñ20 years, 80 percent had underlying diseases and 29 percent received antibiotics prior to admission. Hospital length of stay was 10.4ñ10 days and global mortality was 7 percent. The diagnostic yield of BC was only 8.2 percent (20 patients). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with positive BC (20 percent) than in those with negative BC (5.8 percent). In only one of the 20 patients with positive BC (0.4 percent of total study population), attending physicians changed empiric antimicrobial therapy based on these results. Conclusions: This study confirms that the diagnostic yield of BC in CAP hospitalized patients is low, that mortality in bacteremic patients is high and suggests that clinical usefulness of BC to guide changes on empiric antimicrobial therapy is limited, in part because attending physicians seldom use such information


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Community-Acquired Infections , Blood Chemical Analysis/methods , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Radiography, Thoracic , Microbiological Techniques
20.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 126(12): 1483-9, dic. 1998. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-243746

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection varies according to the population and geografic area studied. Aim: To evaluate the incidence of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in Chilean subjects with community acquired pneumonia. Patients and methods: Between 1995 and 1997, patients with community acquired pneumonia attending two emergency rooms in Santiago, were studied. The diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection was based on the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae specific IgG antibody in samples from both the acute and convalescent phase, using an indirect microimmunofluorescent technique. Evidence of present infection was defined as seroconversion, a significant increase in the titer of the second sample and an initial titer equal or greater than 1/512. Results: During the study period, 160 patients consulted and seven (six male), aged 54ñ27 years old, complied with the diagnostic criteria of present Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. These patients had no special clinical or radiological features. Five of seven patients improved without any specific treatment. Conclusions: Eight percent of this sample of patients with community acquired pneumonia had Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. This agent should be included in the design of empiric treatment schemes, although our results cast doubt on the pathogenic role of Chlamydia pneumoniae in pneumonia


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Pneumonia, Bacterial/etiology , Immunoglobulin G , Chile/epidemiology , Incidence , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/pathogenicity , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL